White papers, legal commentary and operational analysis from the team that operates at the infrastructure layer of collective actions across the UK, EU and US.
Participation is a defined, independent expertise — and this is where we set it out. Not opinion. Evidence.
Almost no collective action has governed engagement infrastructure that treats participation as a structural asset, not a marketing activity.
Read the full analysis →Funders scrutinise legal merits and quantum in depth. Why participation deserves the same due diligence — and how the Claimant Participation Opinion helps.
Read →Recent CAT certification decisions show operational assumptions attracting real scrutiny. Here's why participation is becoming a genuine differentiator in CAT proceedings.
Read →Our podcast on class actions and collective redress — the people, the cases and the operational reality behind them. GLOs, mass tort and everything in between, across the UK, EU and US. Prefer to listen? Start here.
Operational analysis from live casework — filed by topic, dated, and written to be used.
View all articles →Almost no collective action has governed engagement infrastructure that treats participation as a structural asset, not a marketing activity.
Funders scrutinise legal merits and quantum in depth. Why participation deserves the same due diligence — and how the Claimant Participation Opinion helps.
Recent CAT certification decisions show operational assumptions attracting real scrutiny. Here's why participation is becoming a genuine differentiator in CAT proceedings.
Collective actions rarely fail in one dramatic moment. They leak participation at seven predictable points in the claimant journey — and legal merit alone cannot stop it.
Most collective actions fail before court — not at trial, but through claimant attrition, data failures, and communication breakdowns that compound over time.
Key takeaways Why trust is the operative variable in collective redress When a large claimant group falls apart, the instinct is usually to blame the legal process. But in most […]
No entries under this heading — yet.
A reference framework for what a governed participation system looks like — roles, records, controls and evidence.
By submitting this form you agree to our Privacy Policy. Your data is processed by Mediatasks and its CRM provider in accordance with UK GDPR.
Analysis of participation data across CAT opt-out cases, identifying the infrastructure characteristics that distinguish high-quality engagement from high-volume engagement.
By submitting this form you agree to our Privacy Policy. Your data is processed by Mediatasks and its CRM provider in accordance with UK GDPR.
Side-by-side comparison of infrastructure requirements, compliance standards and participation models across the three primary collective redress jurisdictions.
By submitting this form you agree to our Privacy Policy. Your data is processed by Mediatasks and its CRM provider in accordance with UK GDPR.
A practical guide for funders conducting due diligence on collective redress cases, focused on assessing participation infrastructure quality and associated risk.
By submitting this form you agree to our Privacy Policy. Your data is processed by Mediatasks and its CRM provider in accordance with UK GDPR.
“The collective redress market has a category problem. Every provider describes what they do, but no one has defined what the system needs to look like. That is the gap we exist to close.”
Mediatasks · on strategy
“Most case failures are diagnosed at trial. The infrastructure decisions that caused them were made twelve to eighteen months earlier. By the time the problem is visible, it is already irreversible.”
Mediatasks · on timing
“Claimant participation is not a KPI. It is a structural input that determines whether a case can be funded, defended, and ultimately resolved in the interests of those it was built for.”
Mediatasks · on participation
“The question is never ‘can we get more claimants?’ The question is ‘can we build a participation model that a court, a funder, and a regulator will find defensible three years from now?’”
Mediatasks · on governance
Senior practitioners in law firms, litigation funds and foundations subscribe to stay current on the infrastructure and participation issues that determine case outcomes. No marketing. No noise. Substance only.
Prefer it live? Webinars & briefings →If you’re planning a case or evaluating participation risk, this is where outcomes are decided.