Skip to main content
DOC MT–CPO Claimant participation intelligence Rev. 2026.07 Confidential

Claimant Participation Opinion™

Before you commit further capital, legal cost or management time to a live claim, obtain a structured external opinion on whether the claimant is ready, able and properly supported to participate effectively in the work ahead.

Designed for litigation funders, claimant law firms and organisations reviewing individual matters, claimant cohorts and portfolios.

No claimant data or confidential case documents are required at this stage.

Fixed scope Human-led assessment Clear action plan 100% fee credit toward qualifying follow-on Mediatasks work
Tab 02 · The decision gap MT–CPO / 002
Clause 02 The decision gap

A strong legal case can still carry claimant participation risk

Legal merits analysis answers essential questions about law, evidence, procedure and prospects. It does not necessarily answer whether the claimant will remain responsive, produce the required information, understand the process, maintain a coherent account, attend key appointments and engage realistically with the decisions that arise as the matter progresses.

When participation issues emerge late, they can create additional delay, cost and uncertainty. The Claimant Participation Opinion brings those factors into view while there is still time to act.

DG–01
Delayed or inconsistent responses
DG–02
Missing documents
DG–03
Unresolved account discrepancies
DG–04
Limited process understanding
DG–05
Practical availability constraints
DG–06
Unaddressed support requirements
DG–07
Misaligned expectations
DG–08
Communication breakdown
Tab 03 · What it is MT–CPO / 003
Clause 03 A different kind of opinion

A different kind of opinion for a different decision

The Claimant Participation Opinion is a structured opinion on the claimant’s participation profile in a live matter.

It complements the case team’s legal analysis by examining the human, evidential and operational conditions required for the claimant to participate effectively. It then converts those findings into an overall opinion, an action plan and a concise decision-maker summary.

Start with a Second Opinion. A Second Opinion is a free, no-obligation call (around 20 minutes) to confirm a suspicion that something isn’t adding up. A Claimant Participation Opinion is the paid step up: a structured, in-depth, human-led engagement with written deliverables, for a specific claimant, cohort or portfolio.

CMP–01

Legal merits opinion

Typically considers:

  • Applicable law
  • Liability
  • Causation
  • Quantum
  • Procedure
  • Prospects of success
CMP–02

Claimant Participation Opinion™

Considers:

  • Engagement and responsiveness
  • Process understanding
  • Evidence readiness
  • Areas requiring clarification
  • Practical availability
  • Expectations and decision alignment
  • Support requirements
  • Participation-related actions and risks

The two products answer different questions. A CPO does not replace legal advice or Counsel’s Opinion.

Tab 04 · When to commission MT–CPO / 004
Clause 04 When to commission

Obtain a CPO when claimant participation could influence the next decision

A CPO can be commissioned at any point in the life of a matter. It is particularly useful before a significant commitment, procedural step or change in strategy.

WC–01

Before further funding

Understand claimant participation risk before another tranche of capital is deployed.

WC–02

When progress has slowed

Identify practical, evidential or communication barriers that may be affecting the matter.

WC–03

Before issue

Confirm the claimant’s participation readiness and identify actions that should be completed first.

WC–04

Before expert or witness work

Surface missing information, unresolved account issues and support requirements.

WC–05

Before settlement discussions

Assess the claimant’s understanding of the process, options and decisions ahead.

WC–06

During a portfolio review

Apply a consistent participation framework across a cohort or representative sample.

Tab 05 · The framework MT–CPO / 005
Clause 05 Participation framework

The Mediatasks Participation Framework™

Every CPO applies a structured framework to the information available. The precise scope is agreed before instruction and adapted to the stage, nature and complexity of the matter.

PF–01

Engagement and responsiveness

Examines communication history, response patterns, completion of agreed actions and any barriers affecting continued engagement.

PF–02

Process understanding

Considers whether the claimant understands the nature of the matter, their role, the likely stages ahead and the decisions they may be asked to make.

PF–03

Evidence and document readiness

Identifies available documents, outstanding materials, retrieval barriers and participation-related evidential gaps.

PF–04

Account consistency and clarification

Maps material areas that appear clear, incomplete or in need of clarification. The CPO does not make a finding that a claimant is truthful or untruthful.

PF–05

Practical readiness

Considers availability, communication access, continuity, appointment requirements and other practical factors relevant to participation.

PF–06

Expectations and decision alignment

Reviews the claimant’s understanding of possible timescales, outcomes, costs, responsibilities and settlement decisions.

PF–07

Support and reasonable adjustments

Identifies support or reasonable-adjustment requirements that may enable effective participation.

PF–08

Participation risk and action planning

Converts the findings into priority actions, owners, dependencies and recommended sequencing.

Vulnerability, disability, language needs or support requirements must not be treated as evidence of poor participation. The purpose of this part of the framework is to identify appropriate support and reasonable adjustments, not to penalise an individual for needing them.

Tab 06 · What you receive MT–CPO / 006
Clause 06 What every CPO includes

A decision-ready opinion, not a generic file report

The CPO is designed to be used by the people responsible for progressing, funding or supervising the matter.

D–01

Executive Claimant Participation Opinion

A concise statement of Mediatasks’ overall participation opinion, the principal reasons for it and the limits of the available information.

D–02

Participation Profile

A structured view of the claimant’s current strengths, support requirements and material participation risks.

D–03

Participation Index™

A consistent decision-support indicator derived from the documented framework and reviewed by a human assessor.

D–04

Evidence Gap Matrix

A practical schedule of missing, incomplete or unresolved claimant-side information.

D–05

Priority Action Plan

A sequenced set of recommended actions, with suggested owners and dependencies.

D–06

Decision-Maker Summary

A one-page summary designed for partners, investment committees and senior case stakeholders.

D–07

CPO Debrief

A structured call with the instructing organisation to explain the opinion, answer questions and agree immediate priorities.

D–08

Clarification Window

A defined post-delivery period during which the instructing organisation may raise questions about the content of the opinion.

Tab 07 · Participation Index MT–CPO / 007
Clause 07 A structured indicator

A structured indicator with an explained conclusion

Every full CPO may include a Participation Index™ to help decision-makers compare the current participation position against the documented Mediatasks framework.

The index is not a probability of legal success, a funding decision or an automated verdict. It is one component of a human-led opinion and should always be read with the underlying reasons, limitations and recommended actions.

Claimant Participation Opinion Illustrative example only
Overall participation opinion
Ready with specified actions
Participation Index
82 / 100
Confidence level
High
Engagement and responsiveness
88
Evidence readiness
74
Process understanding
84
Practical readiness
81

Priority actionComplete the identified evidence requests and confirm the claimant communication protocol before the next funding review.

Illustrative example only. Scores are decision-support indicators reviewed by a human assessor — not a percentage probability of legal success, settlement or funding.
Tab 08 · Outcomes MT–CPO / 008
Clause 08 Possible opinion outcomes

A clear opinion with clear next steps

OUT–01

Ready

No material claimant participation barrier has been identified on the information available.

OUT–02

Ready with specified actions

The claimant appears capable of participating effectively, subject to completion of defined priority actions.

OUT–03

Further information required

The available information is insufficient to reach a reliable participation opinion without additional evidence or claimant input.

OUT–04

Material participation concerns

The assessment has identified participation issues that should be considered before further commitment or progression.

Tab 09 · CPO fee credit MT–CPO / 009
CPO fee credit Carry the value forward

The CPO fee can carry forward

If Mediatasks is retained for qualifying follow-on work on the same matter within 12 months of delivering the CPO, 100% of the CPO professional fee will be credited against Mediatasks’ fees for that work.

The CPO stands alone as a decision product. When the relationship continues, the original professional fee becomes a credit toward the next agreed Mediatasks engagement.

Obtain the opinion now. Preserve the value if Mediatasks participates in the next stage.

The credit applies to the net CPO professional fee, excluding VAT, third-party costs and disbursements. It is non-cash, non-transferable, cannot reduce future Mediatasks fees below zero and is subject to the written engagement terms. Qualifying follow-on work must relate to the same matter and be instructed within 12 months of CPO delivery.

Tab 10 · How it works MT–CPO / 010
Clause 10 How it works

From live matter to decision-ready opinion

01 Confidential scoping
02 Conflict and suitability checks
03 Secure intake
04 Assessment and opinion
05 Decision debrief
FIG. CPO–1 — Confidential scoping → conflict & suitability checks → secure intake → assessment & opinion → decision debrief.
Step 01
Confidential scoping — we discuss the matter, the decision the CPO must support and the proposed assessment scope.
Step 02
Conflict and suitability checks — Mediatasks confirms whether the instruction can be accepted and agrees the reporting, confidentiality and data-handling arrangements.
Step 03
Secure intake — the instructing organisation supplies the agreed materials through the approved secure process. Claimant contact is arranged where an interview forms part of the instruction.
Step 04
Assessment and opinion — Mediatasks applies the Participation Framework, records the reasons for its findings and prepares the CPO deliverables.
Step 05
Decision debrief — the opinion is presented to the instructing organisation, questions are addressed and the immediate participation actions are confirmed.

A standard CPO is normally delivered within five working days of complete intake and completion of any agreed claimant interview. Larger, urgent or portfolio instructions are scoped separately.

Tab 11 · Governance MT–CPO / 011
Clause 11 Governance and human judgment

An opinion designed to be useful, including when the conclusion is uncomfortable

The value of a CPO depends on the instructing organisation being able to understand how the conclusion was reached and where relevant commercial relationships exist.

G–01

Same fee regardless of conclusion

The CPO fee does not depend on whether the overall opinion is favourable.

G–02

Separate assessment

Where practicable, the CPO reviewer is separate from the instructing case team’s existing assessment process.

G–03

Conflicts disclosed

Any relationship that could reasonably be considered relevant to the opinion should be identified and managed.

G–04

Human-led conclusion

A human reviewer is responsible for the opinion. A score or software output does not determine the conclusion automatically.

G–05

Reasons and limitations included

The report distinguishes known facts, claimant statements, observations, assumptions and professional opinion.

G–06

The client retains the decision

The instructing organisation decides whether and how the matter proceeds.

Tab 12 · Why Mediatasks MT–CPO / 012
Clause 12 Why Mediatasks

Built around participation

Mediatasks is organised around a simple principle: complex claims require effective participation.

The Claimant Participation Opinion applies that principle to a live litigation decision. It examines how the claimant is informed, supported and engaged; identifies the participation work still required; and presents the result in a form that legal and funding teams can use.

Tab 13 · Who it’s for MT–CPO / 013
Clause 13 Intended audiences

Designed for organisations responsible for live claims

AUD–01

Litigation funders

For initial, continuing or tranche-based funding decisions.

AUD–02

Claimant law firms

For live-case progression, escalation, issue, evidence and settlement preparation.

AUD–03

Claims management businesses

For claimant cohorts being prepared for legal transfer, funding or portfolio review.

AUD–04

ATE insurers

For claimant-side participation information relevant to underwriting or continuing-risk assessment.

AUD–05

Portfolio owners and purchasers

For individual, sample-based or cohort-level participation analysis.

AUD–06

Institutional claim owners

For organisations supervising claims at scale and seeking a consistent external framework.

Tab 14 · Clear limits MT–CPO / 014
Clause 14 What a CPO does not do

Clear limits make the opinion more useful

A Claimant Participation Opinion does not:

  • Determine legal merits
  • Replace Counsel’s Opinion
  • Advise the claimant on their legal rights
  • Decide whether funding should be granted
  • Predict the result of litigation
  • Guarantee continued claimant engagement
  • Make a final finding on credibility or truthfulness
  • Replace the case team’s duties toward vulnerable clients
  • Remove the need for reasonable adjustments
  • Create a solicitor-client relationship
  • Authorise Mediatasks to conduct litigation
  • Make a solely automated decision about an individual

Legal advice should be obtained from an appropriately authorised legal adviser.

Tab 15 · FAQ MT–CPO / 015
Clause 15 Questions

Frequently asked questions

What is a Claimant Participation Opinion™?

A Claimant Participation Opinion, or CPO, is a structured external opinion on a claimant’s ability, readiness and support requirements for effective participation in a live claim.

It considers matters such as engagement, process understanding, evidence readiness, account consistency, practical availability, expectations and support requirements. It then presents an overall participation opinion, priority actions and a decision-maker summary.

Is a CPO a legal opinion?

No.

A CPO is a claimant-participation and decision-support product. It does not determine legal merits, liability, quantum or prospects of success, and it does not replace legal advice or Counsel’s Opinion.

Where legal analysis is required, it should be obtained separately from an appropriately authorised legal adviser.

Is this the same as a Collective Proceedings Order?

No.

Within Competition Appeal Tribunal proceedings, CPO commonly means Collective Proceedings Order. The Mediatasks Claimant Participation Opinion is a separate commercial and operational assessment product.

It is not issued, certified or endorsed by the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

Who commissions a CPO?

CPOs are designed for organisations responsible for progressing, funding, insuring, acquiring or supervising claims.

These may include litigation funders, claimant law firms, claims management businesses, ATE insurers, portfolio owners, portfolio purchasers and institutional claim owners.

When should a CPO be commissioned?

A CPO can be commissioned at any stage of a live matter.

It is particularly useful before a further funding decision, issue, expert instruction, witness preparation, mediation, a settlement discussion, portfolio acquisition, portfolio transfer or another significant commitment of cost or management time.

It may also be useful where a case has slowed and the instructing organisation wants an external view of the claimant participation issues involved.

What does a CPO examine?

The precise scope is agreed for each instruction.

A full CPO may consider:

  • Engagement and responsiveness
  • Understanding of the claim and litigation process
  • Evidence and document readiness
  • Areas of the claimant’s account requiring clarification
  • Practical availability and communication continuity
  • Expectations around timing, decisions and possible outcomes
  • Support and reasonable-adjustment requirements
  • Participation-related risks and recommended actions

The CPO does not make a legal merits determination.

Will Mediatasks interview the claimant?

A structured claimant interview may form part of the CPO where it is appropriate, proportionate and agreed with the instructing organisation.

The instruction will specify whether an interview is required, who will arrange it, what the claimant will be told, how consent and privacy information will be handled, whether the instructing organisation will attend and how the interview material may be used.

Some limited CPOs may be completed on a desk-based basis. Where direct claimant input has not been obtained, this will be recorded as a limitation.

Who prepares the opinion?

Each CPO is assigned to a named Mediatasks assessor operating under the documented Participation Framework.

The proposal or engagement documentation will identify the assessor and provide verified information about their relevant experience.

Where the instruction requires legal analysis, that element must be provided under a separate arrangement by an appropriately authorised legal professional.

How long does a CPO take?

A standard CPO is intended to be delivered within five working days after Mediatasks has received the complete agreed information and any required claimant interview has taken place.

Urgent, complex, multi-claimant and portfolio instructions may require a different timetable, which will be agreed before the work begins.

What documents are required?

The required material depends on the matter and the stage it has reached.

It may include:

  • A case summary
  • Key correspondence
  • Relevant agreements
  • Existing chronologies
  • Claimant questionnaires or onboarding records
  • Available witness material
  • Evidence requests and responses
  • Communication history
  • Previous assessments or legal opinions
  • Details of outstanding claimant actions

Mediatasks will provide a tailored intake checklist after the scope has been agreed.

Confidential case documents should not be sent through the public website form.

What is the Participation Index™?

The Participation Index is a structured decision-support indicator that may form part of a full CPO.

It draws together relevant findings under the Mediatasks Participation Framework and is reviewed by a human assessor.

It is not a probability of legal success, an automated funding decision, a pass-or-fail decision or a substitute for the reasons set out in the opinion.

The opinion and underlying analysis should always be read as a whole.

Does the Participation Index decide whether a case should be funded?

No.

The Participation Index does not approve or reject a case. It informs the instructing organisation’s own legal, funding or commercial decision.

The client remains responsible for deciding whether and how the matter proceeds.

How are vulnerability and support needs treated?

The purpose of the CPO is to identify what may be required for effective participation.

A claimant must not receive an adverse participation assessment merely because they are disabled, vulnerable, require interpretation, communicate differently, need additional explanation or require reasonable adjustments.

The CPO should identify appropriate support, communication and adjustment measures where relevant.

Is the opinion independent?

The CPO is intended to provide a separately prepared external view.

Its fee does not depend on the conclusion reached, and the report should disclose relevant relationships or conflicts that could reasonably affect how the opinion is perceived.

Mediatasks should use the unqualified word “independent” only where its governance, reviewer separation and conflict-management arrangements support that description.

Can a CPO be commissioned for more than one claimant?

Yes.

Mediatasks may scope CPO work for individual claimants, selected claimant cohorts, representative portfolio samples or entire portfolios where the methodology and volume permit.

Portfolio instructions may combine individual opinions with aggregated observations, recurring participation themes and recommended operational actions.

Will the claimant receive the CPO?

The reporting and access arrangements are agreed with the instructing organisation before work begins and must comply with applicable legal, professional and data-protection obligations.

Mediatasks should not promise that a report will never be disclosed, as disclosure rights and litigation obligations may depend on the circumstances.

There should be a defined process for correcting material factual errors.

What happens if the CPO identifies concerns?

The CPO should explain:

  • The concern identified
  • The information on which it is based
  • Any relevant limitation
  • The practical consequence
  • Whether the issue appears capable of remediation
  • The recommended action
  • Who is best placed to take that action
  • The suggested timing

The purpose is not merely to label risk. It is to show what can be done next.

How does the 100% fee credit work?

If Mediatasks is retained for qualifying follow-on work on the same matter within 12 months of CPO delivery, 100% of the net CPO professional fee will be credited against Mediatasks’ fees for that work.

The credit:

  • Applies to the same matter
  • Must be used within 12 months
  • Excludes VAT
  • Excludes disbursements
  • Excludes third-party costs
  • Has no cash value
  • Is not transferable
  • Cannot reduce future Mediatasks fees below zero
  • Is subject to the written engagement terms

The CPO does not oblige the client to retain Mediatasks for further work.

Is the CPO fee refundable?

The CPO fee is not ordinarily refundable once the agreed work has been performed.

The 100% CPO Fee Credit is a credit toward qualifying future Mediatasks work. It is not a cash refund.

Any cancellation, delay or incomplete-information terms will be set out in the engagement documentation.

How much does a CPO cost?

CPOs are provided for a fixed fee agreed before the instruction begins.

The fee depends on factors including the volume of material, the stage and complexity of the matter, whether claimant interviews are required, the number of claimants, the required delivery timetable and whether the instruction covers a portfolio or representative sample.

The initial scoping discussion is used to confirm the appropriate scope and fee.

How is confidential information handled?

Mediatasks will agree the relevant confidentiality, data-controller or processor roles, transfer method, retention period and access arrangements before receiving case materials.

The public enquiry form should be used only to request a discussion.

Claimant information and confidential documents must be transferred through the approved secure intake process after the instruction has been accepted.

Does instructing Mediatasks create a legal retainer?

No.

A CPO instruction is an engagement with Mediatasks for the agreed assessment product. It does not by itself create a solicitor-client relationship or authorise Mediatasks to conduct litigation.

Any legal representation or reserved legal work must be separately agreed with an appropriately authorised legal provider.

Tab 16 · Request MT–CPO / 016
Clause 16 Request a discussion

Request a confidential CPO discussion

Tell us enough to understand the proposed instruction. Do not include claimant names, health information or confidential case documents at this stage.

Confidential No claimant data required Human-led review

Request a confidential CPO discussion

By submitting this form you agree to our Privacy Policy. Your data is processed by Mediatasks and its CRM provider in accordance with UK GDPR.

Tab 17 · Next step MT–CPO / 017
Claimant Participation Opinion™ Next step

Before the next major decision, understand the participation position

Discuss a live matter, claimant cohort or portfolio with Mediatasks. No claimant documents are required for the initial conversation.

Initial enquiries should contain no claimant names, medical information or confidential case documents.

The Claimant Participation Opinion™ is a commercial and operational decision-support product provided by Mediatasks. It is not legal advice, does not determine legal merits and does not guarantee funding, case progression, settlement or outcome. Legal advice should be obtained from an appropriately authorised legal adviser. “CPO” in this context means Claimant Participation Opinion and is not a Collective Proceedings Order issued by the Competition Appeal Tribunal. All instructions are subject to conflict, suitability, confidentiality, data-protection and engagement checks.

Mediatasks Limited, registered in England and Wales, company number 08556369. Registered office: 9, The WorkStack, 599 Woolwich Road, London, SE7 7GS. Privacy & Cookie Policy Terms & Conditions