White papers & reports
Our research on the engagement layer of collective redress — frameworks, comparative studies and due-diligence guides.
Each is a working reference, written for the firms, foundations and funders who have to defend a case’s participation model.
The claimant engagement infrastructure standard
A reference framework for what a governed participation system looks like — roles, records, controls and evidence.
Read & request the paper →Participation quality in opt-out actions
Analysis of participation data across CAT opt-out cases, identifying the infrastructure characteristics that distinguish high-quality engagement from high-volume engagement.
Read & request the paper →Cross-jurisdictional engagement
Side-by-side comparison of infrastructure requirements, compliance standards and participation models across the three primary collective redress jurisdictions.
Read & request the paper →Evaluating engagement risk
A practical guide for funders conducting due diligence on collective redress cases, focused on assessing participation infrastructure quality and associated risk.
Read & request the paper →Read them against your own case.
If the research raises questions about a live case, a second opinion is confidential and without obligation.