Skip to main content
DOC MT–WW1 Who we work with Rev. 2026.07 UK·EU·US

Built to work with you. Not around you.

CF1 integrates into existing case structures — strengthening participation without disrupting delivery.

This clause sets out who CF1 serves, and where it sits in the structures they already run.

Tab 02 · The connective layer MT–WW1 / 002
Clause 02 The connective layer

Three parties carry a claim. Participation sits between them.

Every collective action rests on the same three parties:

WW–01
Law firms — strategy, filing and advocacy
WW–02
Foundations (stichtings) — governance and claimant representation
WW–03
Litigation funders — capital and risk

Each of the three does its part expertly. Participation — the system that decides whether claimants register, stay engaged and reach distribution — is the layer no single role was set up to own.

That layer is ours to run.

It’s the same with the suppliers a case strings together — lead-gen, PR, software vendors, administrators. Each owns a slice; the participation layer runs across them all. See the landscape →

Tab 03 · System alignment MT–WW1 / 003
Clause 03 System alignment

We don’t replace existing roles.

CF1 sits between the parties a case already has — one participation layer serving all three.

Law firmsStrategy & advocacy
FoundationsGovernance & representation
FundersCapital & risk
CF1 layer
Participation systemRegistration → engagement → distribution
FIG. WW–1 — System alignment: three parties, one participation layer.

We strengthen the system that connects them.

Tab 04 · Law firms MT–WW1 / 004
Clause 04 Law firms

Law firms

“A properly reasoned and researched estimate of likely take-up is crucial to understanding the actual value of a claim.”

Competition Appeal Tribunal

We support law firms to build stronger cases — better participation strategy, clearer documentation and defensible projections.

  • Participation modelling and case assessment
  • Document and evidence framework
  • Strategic participation and take-up support
  • Court-ready reporting and expert validation

Legal strategy stays with the firm. CF1 supplies the participation evidence the strategy stands on.

Tab 05 · Stichtings MT–WW1 / 005
Clause 05 Foundations (stichtings)

Foundations (stichtings)

“Effective collective redress relies on coordination, not just good intentions.”

Competition Appeal Tribunal

We help foundations discharge their responsibility with confidence — through structured processes, transparency and cross-border coordination.

  • Governance and decision-making support
  • Claimant engagement and communication
  • Cross-border participation infrastructure
  • Transparency, reporting and accountability

The foundation represents the class. CF1 gives it the operating system to do so — evidenced, auditable and consistent across jurisdictions.

Tab 06 · Funders MT–WW1 / 006
Clause 06 Litigation funders

Litigation funders

“An outcome cannot be considered a success where a significant gap remains between projected and actual returns.”

Gutmann v First MTR South Western Trains Ltd & Anor [2025] CAT 72

We deliver the visibility funders need to make informed decisions — before, during and after participation.

  • Take-up forecasting and risk analysis
  • Participation tracking and live intelligence
  • Performance reporting and outcome analysis
  • Protecting capital through better data

Participation is where projected returns become actual returns. CF1 makes that measurable, case by case.

Tab 07 · Ecosystem MT–WW1 / 007
Clause 07 The wider ecosystem

No single provider delivers every part of a collective action.

And increasingly, they shouldn’t. CF1 is designed to support that structure — an ecosystem of providers working as one system.

Alongside the three parties, we work with

  • Claims administrators
  • Technology providers
  • Data and verification partners
  • Communications teams

If you work in this space and want to be part of that system — we’d like to hear from you.

Tab 08 · Method MT–WW1 / 008
Clause 08 How we work

How we work

The same method, whichever seat you hold in the case.

Step 01 · Review
We assess your current case structure and identify where participation risks sit.
Step 02 · Design
We build the engagement and participation infrastructure around your case structure.
Step 03 · Implement
We deploy, monitor and adjust the system across the full lifecycle of the case.
Tab 09 · Next step MT–WW1 / 009
Clause 09 Next step

Stronger cases start with stronger systems.

Wherever you sit — firm, foundation or funder — CF1 integrates into the structure you already run.