Skip to main content
DOC MT–IN1 Infrastructure Rev. 2026.07 UK·EU·US

Participation doesn’t scale by chance. It scales by design.

Demand gets claimants through the door. Infrastructure is what carries them through to a completed claim.

This clause sets out the infrastructure that participation runs on — and the difference it makes across the life of a case.

Tab 02 · Positioning MT–IN1 / 002
Clause 02 Positioning

Built for reach. Now judged on completion.

For years, participation was run for reach, visibility and awareness — and that was enough.

Courts have moved on. They are looking at:

Q–01
Who actually completes?
Q–02
What data is usable?
Q–03
What do claimants receive?
“The method of distribution must be clearly explained in the notice so that class members understand how and when they will be paid.”
Extract — notice requirements

Awareness is an input. Completion is the outcome the case is judged on. Infrastructure is what turns one into the other.

A case usually assembles participation from four kinds of supplier — lead-gen, PR, software vendors and administrators. Each owns a slice. Infrastructure is the layer that runs across them. See the landscape →

Tab 03 · The sequence MT–IN1 / 003
Clause 03 The sequence

Participation is not a single action.
It is a sequence.

Input → Understanding → Trust → Completion → Valid claim → Distribution. Select a stage to see where it’s usually lost — and what holds it.

Stage 01 / 06 — INPUT

Claimants join through a labyrinth of entry points, not knowing exactly what they’re joining.

Without it: The wrong book, built expensively.

Fig. 1 — The participation sequence. Select a stage to see where it’s usually lost.

The four pillars — Clarity, Connection, Flow, Reach — are how CF1 moves claimants through this sequence.

If any part of the sequence breaks:

B–01

Claimants drop out

B–02

Data becomes unusable

B–03

Outcomes collapse

Tab 04 · Core CF1 model MT–IN1 / 004
Clause 04 The four pillars

CF1 is not software

It is the methodology that governs the claimant experience — four pillars the Participation Operating System™ is built to deliver.

P–01
Clarity — diagnosis of drop-off and friction points
P–02
Connection — participation is a risk decision; the system has to earn it
P–03
Flow — most drop-off happens in-process, not at awareness
P–04
Reach — if the payout process is unclear or delayed, participation collapses

“A period of three months is much too short… particularly for a class of this size and scope.”
Extract — on distribution windows

Tab 05 · Distribution MT–IN1 / 005
Clause 05 Why distribution is now central

Why distribution is now central

Courts are no longer judging cases on awareness. They are judging them on what claimants actually receive.

One recorded settlement outcome:

Void claims
7,290
Distributed
~£216k
Unclaimed
~£9.98 million
“This outcome cannot be considered a success overall…”
Extract — settlement review

The gap between theoretical value and real-world outcome is an infrastructure failure.

Tab 06 · Built for MT–IN1 / 006
Clause 06 Who this works with

Infrastructure that fits around the case

P–01

Law firms

We strengthen delivery without disrupting legal strategy.

P–02

Foundations (Stichtings)

We support structures designed for real claimant engagement across jurisdictions.

P–03

Funders

We reduce execution risk by aligning participation with expected returns.

Tab 07 · Timing MT–IN1 / 007
Clause 07 Why this matters now

Infrastructure is not something you fix after launch

By that point, everything the system needed is already locked:

L–01

Design — locked

L–02

Filing — locked

L–03

Launch — locked

Whether claimants will claim, complete and receive meaningful outcomes is decided before any of them are visible.

Tab 08 · Operating modes MT–IN1 / 008
Clause 08 How it is delivered

One system. Three operating modes.

The infrastructure runs in three configurations of the same Participation Operating System™ — the same claimant record and the same governance, matched to where a case starts.

One question decides the mode: do you already hold the claimant book?

Compare the three modes →
Mode 01

CasePartners™

The data already exists. Your team holds the book; Mediatasks provides the participation infrastructure that turns it into registered, validated claimants.

Read the mode →
Mode 02

LeadPartners™

No claimant data. Mediatasks builds the book — national acquisition, registration and engagement — then runs it through to settlement readiness.

Read the mode →
Mode 03

ArbPartners™

US mass arbitration. Acquisition, operations and arbitration-ready filing at campaign scale, on a performance basis.

Read the mode →
Tab 09 · Next step MT–IN1 / 009
Clause 09 Next step

Build the system
before you launch the case.

Participation is not a variable. It is an outcome of the system you design.